Online Stores - Chapter 11 Case Summary

Business Description

Online Stores PA LLC ("OLS"), together with its parent NMR Enterprises NJ LLC ("NMR") (collectively, the "Debtors"), is a Pennsylvania-based eCommerce business that sells affordable consumer goods, including home décor, holiday and celebration products (flags, flagpoles), personal protective equipment, safety clothing and footwear, candy and tea, chimney pipe, LED bulbs, and other everyday household items.

• OLS operates five proprietary eCommerce websites under its corporate site, www.onlinestores.com, and also sells merchandise through major third-party marketplaces, including Amazon, eBay, and Walmart.
• The Company manufactures certain merchandise in-house and relies on a network of vendors, freight and logistics providers, and a third-party fulfillment center to maintain a continuous supply of goods to its thousands of customers.

For the calendar year ended December 31, 2025, OLS generated sales in excess of $30 million.

As of the Petition Date, OLS employed approximately 37 full-time employees, comprising both hourly, non-exempt workers eligible for overtime pay and salaried, exempt staff compensated on a fixed basis. The Debtors also engage the services of approximately 15 independent contractors.

---

Corporate History

NMR Enterprises NJ LLC is a New Jersey limited liability company and the sole member of OLS, which is a Pennsylvania limited liability company. Both entities are owned, directly or indirectly, by Aharon Michael Rosenberg, who serves as the sole member of NMR and the Chief Executive Officer of OLS.

Organizational Structure

• NMR Enterprises NJ LLC: New Jersey LLC; sole member of OLS and the parent entity in the corporate structure. Owned by Aharon Michael Rosenberg.
• Online Stores PA LLC: Pennsylvania LLC; the primary operating entity conducting all eCommerce and manufacturing activities.
  

---

Operations Overview

OLS operates a multi-channel eCommerce business, selling consumer goods through five proprietary websites and several major online marketplaces. The Company manufactures a portion of its product offerings and sources additional inventory from third-party vendors.

Warehousing and Fulfillment

OLS relies on 3PL Pro's LLC ("3PL") for warehousing, inventory management, and order fulfillment services. 3PL stores, manages, picks, packs, and ships substantially all of the Debtors' merchandise from its facility located at 2201 Green Lane, Unit #9, Levittown, Pennsylvania 19057.

• 3PL maintains physical possession and control of a significant portion of OLS's inventory at any given time, making the relationship critical to the Company's ability to continue operating as a going concern.
• Any disruption in 3PL's services, including any refusal to release or ship inventory, would have an immediate and material adverse effect on the Debtors' operations, customer relationships, marketplace performance metrics, and revenue.

Customer Programs and Payment Processing

The Debtors offer various return and exchange policies standard in the eCommerce industry, designed to promote customer satisfaction and preserve the goodwill of the business.

• The majority of OLS's sales are transacted via credit card payments, processed through third-party payment processing companies under existing Payment Processing Agreements.
• Uninterrupted payment processing is integral to OLS's ability to operate its business and maximize the value of its estates.

Cash Management and Liquidity

The Debtors maintain a centralized cash management system to collect and disburse funds, pay financial obligations, monitor corporate funds, and comply with financing agreement requirements. An in-house accounting department oversees the system and manages all collection and disbursement activity.

• As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had collected or incurred approximately $110,000 in prepetition sales and use taxes that had not yet been remitted to the applicable taxing authorities.
• To fund post-petition operations, the Debtors seek to use cash collateral of their prepetition lender, FNB, and to obtain debtor-in-possession revolving financing from M Lesoda LLC, in accordance with a 13-week budget reflecting the Debtors' projected financial needs.

---

Prepetition Obligations

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors report approximately $2.1 million in secured debt and an estimated $4.8 million in third-party unsecured claims. The Company's prepetition capital structure is summarized below:

Secured Credit Facility

• Approximately $2.1 million in principal is outstanding under a revolving credit agreement with First National Bank of Pennsylvania, originally entered into on Nov. 30, 2020, providing for borrowings of up to $7 million.
  • The facility is secured by a first-priority lien on all of OLS's assets. As of the Petition Date, the value of the collateral is approximately $2.4 million, consisting primarily of inventory (on an average cost basis) and accounts receivable.
  • Following certain events of default under the loan documents, OLS and the Lender entered into a Forbearance Agreement on Dec. 21, 2023, under which the Lender agreed to forbear from exercising its remedies during a specified forbearance period. Subsequent amendments extended the forbearance period through May 31, 2026. However, on Feb. 2, 2026, the Lender issued a default letter under both the Credit Agreement and the Forbearance Agreement.
  • OLS has requested the Lender commission a reassessment of its inventory collateral. The prior appraisal included both saleable and slow-moving or obsolete inventory, resulting in a blended advance rate that no longer reflects current conditions. OLS has since removed approximately $1.5 million of outdated inventory from its system, materially improving the quality and liquidity of the remaining inventory. The Company believes a reassessment would yield a significantly improved advance rate.

Unsecured Claims

• As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that third-party unsecured claims total approximately $4.8 million.

---

Events Leading to Bankruptcy

Macroeconomic and Industry Headwinds

• Like many eCommerce operators, the Debtors confronted a challenging commercial environment beginning in 2023 and persisting through 2025, marked by sustained margin compression driven by a confluence of adverse factors:
  • Intensifying competition, rising customer acquisition costs, and inflationary increases across product, labor, and freight expenses collectively eroded profitability.
  • Ongoing volatility in consumer demand further strained the Debtors' revenue base and constrained liquidity.

Digital Advertising Deterioration

• The Debtors' marketing performance deteriorated materially as competition across paid digital advertising channels—including platforms operated by Google and Microsoft—intensified significantly:
  • The cost of key search terms and digital placements rose sharply, while impressions and visibility declined, resulting in diminished efficiency and lower returns on advertising spend despite continued investment.
  • These conditions constrained revenue growth and compounded existing liquidity pressures.

Cyber Incident and Platform Migration Disruptions

• The Debtors experienced operational and technological disruptions that negatively impacted sales and marketing performance:
  • A cyber incident forced a temporary pause of certain website operations and required the engagement of external security experts, implementation of additional protective measures, and remediation of disruptions to customer communications and email marketing workflows—all of which had lingering revenue effects.
  • A strategically necessary migration of the Debtors' eCommerce platform resulted in temporary declines in organic traffic, marketing attribution challenges, and a reduced ability to optimize paid advertising campaigns during the transition period, further depressing sales.

Cost-Cutting and Operational Restructuring

• In response to mounting financial pressures, the Debtors undertook extensive measures to reduce costs, simplify operations, and stabilize the business:
  • Multiple rounds of workforce reductions were implemented alongside selective outsourcing, vendor renegotiations, and broad cost containment initiatives across departments.
  • The Debtors closed multiple warehouse facilities and consolidated fulfillment operations into a single location before transitioning to a third-party logistics provider to further reduce fixed overhead and align costs with demand.
  • Inventory and SKU rationalization initiatives were executed, reducing the number of actively stocked products to lower storage requirements, carrying costs, and operational complexity.
• In parallel, the Debtors pursued targeted revenue stabilization efforts, including adjustments to marketing strategy, revisions to paid advertising approaches, improvements to data and attribution processes, and optimization of product listings and customer communications. These initiatives remain ongoing and are being implemented cautiously alongside continued expense reductions.

Microsoft Credit Hold Threat

• The Debtors' operations are fundamentally premised on the use of eCommerce advertising platforms, with Microsoft serving as a critical revenue driver:
  • On January 18, 2026, Microsoft threatened to place OLS' account on "credit hold," casting significant doubt on the platform's willingness to continue doing business with OLS.
  • Given OLS' significant dependence on Microsoft-driven sales, the suspension threat was viewed as potentially catastrophic to the Debtors' ability to generate income.
  • By late January 2026, it became clear that the viability of the Debtors' continued operations could be jeopardized absent the protections of the automatic stay to prevent Microsoft from acting on its threat.

Failed Lender Negotiations and DIP Financing

• Beginning January 30, 2026, OLS pursued discussions with its existing Lender in an effort to secure consent to use cash collateral and obtain an overadvance facility consistent with a 13-week budget:
  • Despite good-faith efforts, the Lender rejected OLS' proposal, leaving the Debtors without sufficient working capital to fund ongoing operations.
  • With no viable alternative, OLS determined that its only recourse was to obtain debtor-in-possession financing, which M Lesoda LLC has agreed to provide.

Chapter 11 Filing and Path Forward

• On February 5, 2026 (the "Petition Date"), the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to preserve the value of their assets for the benefit of all creditors:
  • The Debtors intend to pursue all available strategic options for reorganizing their financial affairs, including a potential Section 363 sale of assets.
  • Discussions are currently underway with potential investment bankers regarding the terms of an acceptable engagement and, separately, with a potential stalking horse purchaser.
• The Debtors filed a series of First Day Motions seeking authority to, among other things:
  • Use cash collateral and obtain DIP financing to fund post-petition operations.
  • Pay prepetition employee wages, salaries, and reimbursable expenses.
  • Maintain existing customer programs, credit card processing agreements, and the cash management system.
  • Pay prepetition sales and use taxes of approximately $110,000 and satisfy prepetition claims of the Debtors' third-party logistics provider, 3PL Pro's LLC, which maintains physical possession and control of substantially all of the Debtors' inventory.
• The Debtors believe that the protections afforded by Chapter 11 will enable them to maintain current operations in the ordinary course of business while pursuing a value-maximizing strategy for the benefit of their creditors and estates.